Executive snapshot (why Berkshire’s 2024 playbook looks so different)
	
		
			
				| Metric | 
				2022-23 (post-pandemic catch-up) | 
				2024 YTD (selective resets) | 
			
		
		
			
				| Premium tied to Berkshire personal-auto filings | 
        $9.9B | 
				$0.29B | 
			
      
				| Premium-weighted avg. rate impact | 
        +6.5% | 
				+1.3% | 
			
      
				| States with net ↑ / ↓ / 0 change | 
        46 / 0 / 1 | 
        11 / 25 / 9 | 
      
		
	
 Sources: “Berkshire Hathaway Premium Changes by Region – Personal Lines –Since 2022”, “Berkshire vs Peers vs The Rest – Premium Changes by Region –Since 2024”, and state-level companion files.
Berkshire vs. peers since 2024 – the outlier strategy
Region-level filings filed after 1 Jan 2024 show Berkshire carving out avery different path from the “big-4” peers (State Farm, Progressive, Allstate,Liberty Mutual) and from the long-tail “Other” group:
	
		
			
				| Region | 
				Berkshire premium-weighted impact | 
				Top-4 peers | 
        All other writers | 
			
		
		
			
				| East | 
        -0.1% | 
				+6.6% | 
				+5.5% | 
			
			
				| Midwest | 
        -0.5% | 
				+1.3% | 
				+3.7% | 
			
			
				| South | 
        +1.2% | 
				+2.3% | 
				+3.8% | 
			
			
				| West | 
        +0.5% | 
				+5.0% | 
				+6.7% | 
			
      
				| Total | 
        +1.3% | 
				+4.3% | 
				+5.3% | 
			
		
	
 
Observation: while competitors are still pushing mid-single-digit increases to cope with continued loss-cost inflation, Berkshire’s filings are flat-to-down in the East & Midwest and only modestly positive elsewhere.  That restraint follows two very aggressive post-pandemic years (2022-23) when Berkshire rang up a cumulative +6-8% in every region, front-loading a lot of margin recovery earlier than peers.
Strategic takeaway: Berkshire appears to be harvesting the goodwill of last cycle’s increases and using price stability as a retention / share-grab lever just as rivals’ renewal notices remain elevated.
What changed between 2022-23 and 2024? 
	
		
			
				| Region | 
				2022-23 weighted impact | 
				2024 weighted impact | 
        Directional shift | 
			
		
		
			
				| West | 
        +8.5% | 
				+0.5% | 
				▼ –8.0 pp | 
			
			
				| South | 
        +5.2% | 
				+1.2% | 
				▼ –4.0 pp | 
			
			
				| East | 
        +5.7% | 
				-0.1% | 
				▼ –5.8 pp | 
			
			
				| Midwest | 
        +5.7% | 
				-0.5% | 
				▼ –6.2 pp | 
			
		
	
 
Berkshire has de-risked its rate plan almost everywhere, implying that the company:
- Believes its 2022-23 hikes already offset loss-severity pressure (especially bodily-injury severity that peaked in 2023).
 - Prioritizes retention while competitors remain in the rate-cycle upswing.
 - May be betting on favorable re-underwriting (tighter segmentation, usage-based endorsements) to defend margins without headline rate.
 
State-by-state drill-down (filings dated 2024-YTD)
Top ten upward moves
	
		
			
				| State | 
				Impact | 
				Premium at stake ($) | 
			
		
		
			
				| California | 
        +25.7% | 
				4.7M | 
			
			
				| Nevada | 
        +17.2% | 
				108.3M | 
			
 			
				| Texas | 
        +5.5% | 
				228.4M | 
			
 			
				| Montana | 
        +2.9% | 
				1.9M | 
			
 			
				| Minnesota | 
        +2.1% | 
				14.2M | 
			
 			
				| Delaware | 
        +2.0% | 
				9.6M | 
			
 			
				| Georgia | 
        +1.5% | 
				96.5M | 
			
 			
				| Maryland | 
        +1.2% | 
				21.6M | 
			
 			
				| New Jersey | 
        +0.5% | 
				22.8M | 
			
			
				| Vermont | 
        +0.4% | 
				0.3M | 
			
		
	
 
Top ten downward moves
	
		
			
				| State | 
				Impact | 
				Premium at stake ($) | 
			
		
		
			
				| Iowa | 
        -3.2% | 
				-4.5M | 
			
			
				| Colorado | 
        -2.3% | 
				-26.2M | 
			
			
				| Nebraska | 
        -2.2% | 
				-2.5M | 
			
			
				| Tennessee | 
        -2.1% | 
				-25.7M | 
			
			
				| Indiana | 
        -1.5% | 
				-6.5M | 
			
			
				| Arizona | 
        -1.4% | 
				-29.2M | 
			
			
				| Louisiana | 
        -1.4% | 
				-12.2M | 
			
			
				| Oregon | 
        -1.3% | 
				-12.1M | 
			
		
	
 
What the pattern says
- Targeted relief in large “growth” states (TX, GA) but surgical cuts in high-loss, high-churn states (PA, CO, LA).
 - California stands out: a single +25% filing, but on a narrow book—likely a niche program or retro-rating segment designed to restore profitability after the 2022-23 moratorium environment.
 - Flat filings in 9 states signal a deliberate wait-and-see posture where Berkshire feels its 2022-23 head-room is still adequate.
 
Why this matters for competitors
- Timing advantage: having moved early (2022-23), Berkshire can now pause, advertise “stable prices,” and exploit competitors’ sticker shock.
 - Selective aggressiveness: the company still pushes double-digit hikes where actuarial indications are unavoidable (e.g., Nevada bodily-injury severity).
 - Capital deployment: the $0.29B of premium affected in 2024 is < 3% of what Berkshire touched in the prior two years, freeing bandwidth to funnel capital into new-business growth instead of DOIs.
 - Regulatory optics: rolling back or flattening rates in the East & Midwest may curry favor with departments that earlier approved sizeable hikes.
 
Watch-list items & next steps
- Monitor SERFF dockets for follow-up filings in TX and NV; if Berkshire pursues a second-round increase, peers may need to match to avoid adverse selection.
 - Keep an eye on Pennsylvania: A −7% cut suggests profitability is solid; expect switching activity from carriers still raising rates.
 - Loss-cost trend vs. margin: If frequency or severity re-accelerates in H2-2025, Berkshire’s restraint could compress margins faster than peers that are still “pricing ahead of trend.”
 
Bottom line
Berkshire Hathaway used 2022-23 to push through industry-leading increases (≈ +6.5% on nearly $10B of premium).  Having banked that cushion, it is now the only top-five auto writer leaning into price stability—cutting or freezing rates in 34 of 45 state-level filings in 2024.  The strategy should lift retention and new-business flow in the near term, but competitors need to decide quickly whether to preserve margin (and risk share) or follow Berkshire down the slope in the next renewal cycle.